China overplayed its hand with Trump on trade, and it could cost them dearly

(CNN)China
and the United States were moving towards an agreement to end a
months-long trade war when, suddenly, it all fell apart this week.
Now
as negotiators scramble to resurrect the deal, revelations are emerging
that indicate both sides appeared to think they had the other over a
barrel. As a result, they pushed for more, setting the stage for a rapid
escalation in tensions which undid session after session of hard-fought
negotiations.
Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump promised to raise tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods, sending markets plummeting and wrong-footing Beijing, which did not issue an immediate response and muzzled state media from reporting on the threat.
On Wednesday, the Chinese government threatened to retaliate,
as its top trade negotiator, Vice Premier Liu He heads to Washington
for what was supposed to be among the last rounds of discussions with US
trade envoy Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.
"The
escalation of trade friction is not in the interests of the people of
the two countries and the people of the world," the Chinese Commerce
Ministry said in a statement Wednesday.
On Twitter,
Trump accused Beijing of attempting to run out the clock on his
administration in the assumption it will be dealing with a Democratic
administration after 2020. Speaking at a rally in Florida later
Wednesday, Trump said the new tariffs were because China "broke the
deal."
"You see the tariffs we're doing?" the President asked his supporters. "Because they broke the deal!"
"The
vice premier is flying in tomorrow, good man, but they broke the deal.
They can't do that," he added. "If we don't make the deal, nothing wrong
with taking in over 100 billion a year. We never did that before."
When
Liu, Lighthizer and Mnuchin sit down, however, they will not be
engaging in handshakes and backslapping, but instead acrimonious
negotiations pushed most of the way back to square one.
A deal may still result from those talks, but it will be a far harder fought one than anyone expected only a month ago.
What happened?
In
launching his trade war, Trump hoped to force China to further open its
market to US exports, stop the forced sharing of intellectual property
with China, and rewrite trade deals he said have unfairly benefited
Beijing.
To do so, he has launched
an all out assault against the Chinese economy, massively ramping up
tariffs on a large variety of goods and industries. In response, China
has imposed its own tariffs, hitting in particular US farmers.
Trump's strategy is based on the fact that, as the US is the net buyer and China is the net seller in their trade relationship, Beijing will blink before Washington. The Chinese economy is also fundamentally more vulnerable than that of the US, and Chinese President Xi Jinping faces a host of political pressures that make a prolonged trade war difficult.
At
first -- despite widespread criticism over the damage to US economic
growth and particularly agriculture -- Trump's strategy seemed to be
paying off: He forced Beijing to the negotiating table, and in December
the two sides agreed to a temporary truce.
In April,
Chinese state media reported that negotiators had "reached new
consensus on such important issues as the text of the ... trade
agreement," while the White House said the talks beginning this week
would "cover trade issues including intellectual property, forced
technology transfer, non-tariff barriers, agriculture, services,
purchases, and enforcement," suggesting they were entering their end
stage.
That all changed with Trump's tweets on Sunday.
Crossed wires
Trump has a habit of making policy on Twitter, but his pronouncements on Sunday did not come from nowhere.
US officials told CNN
that at the most recent round of trade talks in Beijing, their Chinese
counterparts sought to renegotiate significant aspects of a prospective
deal that the Americans felt were already wrapped up.
According to Reuters,
a cable sent from Beijing to Washington late Friday included systematic
edits "riddled with reversals by China that undermined core US
demands." These reportedly included backtracking on commitments to
change laws over intellectual property and trade secrets, competition
policy, and currency manipulation.
Speaking
to reporters on Monday, Mnuchin said there were "some signs"
negotiations were "going substantially backwards," prompting him to
update the President.
US officials
said that Trump's tweets were meant to rattle Beijing, and were made
without extensive discussions with his economic advisers.
What
exactly inspired Beijing's broadside is unclear -- a constant peril of
dealing with such an opaque political system -- but it appears to be
based on a misreading of statements and actions by Trump that he was
concerned about the state of the US economy and would be willing to make
concessions.
Last week, Trump laid into the US Federal Reserve on Twitter, echoing criticism he made of its chairman Jerome Powell last year, while praising Chinese policy.
"China
is adding great stimulus to its economy while at the same time keeping
interest rates low. Our Federal Reserve has incessantly lifted interest
rates, even though inflation is very low, and instituted a very big dose
of quantitative tightening. We have the potential to go up like a
rocket if we did some lowering of rates, like one point, and some
quantitative easing," Trump said in a series of tweets.
"Yes,
we are doing very well at 3.2% GDP, but with our wonderfully low
inflation, we could be setting major records (and) at the same time,
make our National Debt start to look small!"
Beijing's perception of US weakness was likely buoyed by its own improving economic situation, with solid first-quarter growth and renewed commitment to Xi's trademark Belt and Road Initiative, which was feted at a conference in the Chinese capital last month attended by dozens of world leaders.
The
assumption that this position of renewed strength would be enough to
make Trump blink seems wildly miscalculated, however. Not only is the US
economy not nearly as weak as some in Beijing appear to believe, this type of last minute renegotiation seems almost specifically designed to infuriate Trump.
The US President has already shown himself willing to walk away from deals when they don't go his direction -- storming out of his second meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Hanoi, derailing months of rapprochement between the two nuclear powers.
That
he would respond equally poorly to strong arm tactics on trade would
have been obvious to any longterm observers of Trump except, it turns
out, those in Beijing.